In a word, Yes! Here's one good
way to understand why. If
you call yourself Catholic, but you want to pick and choose for
yourself which teachings to accept or reject,
you give everyone else same right. For example, you believe
women should be
priests...in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, it states "Only a
baptized man validly receives ordination...For this
reason the ordination of women
is not possible!" You
don't believe that...well, that's fine...
[RIP] just
tear that page out of your Catechism...you just made it a Catechism of
your
Catholic Church...not mine.
But
remember, if you can throw doctrines out, so can
everyone else who
calls themselves Catholic. That gives Joe Parishioner the right to
throw out the Church's
social justice teachings...he doesn't feel like feeding the hungry,
caring for the poor, and all that other "bleeding heart" stuff -
[RIP]...he
just made it a Catechism of his Catholic Church...not mine and not
yours.
You believe contraception is okay? Paragraph 2370 says contraception is
intrinsically evil!
[RIP]
Joe Parishioner doesn't like what the Church teaches on the death
penalty - Paragraphs 2266-2267
[RIP]. You don't like
what it teaches on pages 55-60
[RIP].
He doesn't like what it teaches on pages 128-140
[RIP]
Can you see what's happening? We can't all be the Pope
or make our own rules! If we don't believe in all of it, if we
make ourselves
Pope and create our own doctrines, our faith
is no longer Catholic.
Week
3 : Is the Pope in the Bible, and why do we
have one?
While
the word Pope is not in the bible, the idea
and origin of the Papacy clearly are!
Let’s start at the beginning… It is clear
that Peter is the leader of the apostles.
The others frequently look to him to make decisions, and rule on
proper
teachings of the young church. It is Peter who usually has the last word on
matters, and Jesus saw this in Him.
When Jesus
speaks to Peter in Matthew 16,
He is laying the groundwork and appointing Peter the first Pope. 18And I tell you, you are Peter,*
and on this rock*
I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against
it. 19I
will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind
on earth
will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed
in heaven.’
(Mt.16:18-19) We lose part of the
significance of the wording in English, but in the Greek of the
original text, Peter
is Petros and the rock is petras, so we can see the similarity of the
word. Some people think that it is
Peter’s
faith that is the rock, but it that
were so, why would the very next sentence refer to giving Peter the
keys to the
kingdom of heaven? You can’t give
keys
to a “symbolic faith,” so Jesus MUST
be talking about the person in front of Him, namely Peter.
The phrase is likely a direst reference to Is
22:22-23 where Eliakim is being given the keys to the house of David
(Jesus’
bloodline) 22I will place on his shoulder the key of the
house of
David; he shall open, and no one shall shut; he shall shut, and no one
shall
open. 23I will fasten him like a peg in a secure place, and
he will
become a throne of honor to his ancestral house. Again,
notice the similar wording? In Isaiah,
Eliakim is being given an office
(see vs19-22.) By using this reference
(all Jews then knew the Old Testament), Jesus is inferring that Peter
is also
being given an office.
In John 21:12-17
Jesus makes it very
clear that He is asking Peter to lead his flock, by asking three times
“Do you
love me?” and on Peter’s “Yes,” Jesus tells
Peter to feed his sheep. He is giving
Peter the job to protect and
teach his followers. Now, keep in mind, after Judas was no longer a
part of the
12, they did not just stay at 11, they “filled his
position” (Acts 1:20-26) with
Matthias. So it is reasonale to assume
that if Judas’ position was filled, all the more the
leader’s position should
be filled, hence the passing on of the seat of Peter.
WEEK
4 : Why are there more books in the Catholic
Bible?
It
is true that the Catholic Bible has more books in it than the
Protestant Bible. Protestants will say that Catholics added books to
the Bible, while Catholics say that Protestants subtracted books from
the Bible. Which one is it, and which one should we follow?
The
books in question are all from the Old Testament: Tobit, Judith,
Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, I and II Maccabees, and parts of Esther
and Daniel. Since the Bible we have today did not fall out of the sky
neatly bound in leather, it is important to look at where it came from.
We need to briefly examine the history of the canon (the authoritative
list of writings).
There were two canons
for the Old Testament:
the Hebrew Canon and the Alexandrian Canon. Jewish leaders at the
Council of Jamnia officially recognized the Hebrew canon in AD 90. This
Hebrew Canon did not contain the 7 books in question. The Alexandrian
Canon references the list of books found in the Septuagint. The
Septuagint is the Greek translation of the Old Testament, which was
translated in 250-125BC. The Alexandrian does contain the 7 books in
question.
"If it was good
enough for Jesus, it is good enough for us!"So
which canon are we to follow? Protestants, desiring to stay true to
Christianity’s common heritage with Judaism, will uphold the
Hebrew
canon. Though it sounds good to say that you believe in the same Old
Testament that the Jews believe in, there is one key point that is left
out. During the time of Jesus Christ, Greek was the common language.
Therefore the Bible that Jesus was using was the Greek translation of
the Old Testament, the Septuagint.
Catholics uphold this
Alexandrian canon found in the Septuagint. The main point: If it was
good enough for Jesus, it is good enough for us!
-Kelly Wilson